Bextra
Legal Guide
 FREE Case Review
|
| Whenever you suffer aversely from a medication because of a lack of information or warning about potentially harmful or deadly side effects, you have the right to be compensated for the detrimental consequences to your physical and emotional health. This is especially true for Bextra users who have developed heart conditions, stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding and ulcers, or painful skin disorders.
Pfizer discovered in 2002 that Bextra presented an elevated risk of serious skin irritation during the initial stages of treatment of a variety of different conditions, including arthritis, menstrual cramps, and other forms of chronic inflammation or low level pain. The warning signs for Bextra side effects have been surfacing for some time, but Pfizer chose not to pull the drug from the market until the FDA strongly encouraged them to in April of 2005.
Don’t let huge pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer get away with insensitivity towards consumer safety. Only extensive litigation will force the industry to be more vigilant in researching potentially harmful side effects and in warning consumers about these risks in a timely - perhaps life-saving -manner. If you've suffered from your Bextra usage, contact our lawyers today for a free case review.
|
